Anadrol (Oxymetholone)Anadrol, chemical name Oxymetholone, is known as the most powerful of all oral anabolic steroids. Often compared to Dianabol, Anadrol is a common oral steroid added to a bulking stack when athletes and bodybuilders are after testosterone medication for men mass. Unfortunately, potent anabolic steroidsmost of all oral alpha-alkylated steroids anadrol 50 liver are potent and increasing muscle and enhancing growth processes, bring with them the more serious steroids side effects. Oxymetholone is a DHT derived anabolic steroidswhich means side effects, such as acne, prostate enlargement, aggression, liver and kidney stress, hypertension anadrol 50 liver hair loss can be evident. A study conducted in Iran at Iranian Azad University and published in the journal Procedia, looked at its effects on cholesterol values .
Anadrol Effects On Cholesterol And Liver Values
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. Anabolic steroids, bodybuilding discussion forums. Page 1 of 2 1 2 Last Jump to page: Results 1 to 25 of Is Anadrol more liver toxic than Dianabol? Are they the same,mg per mg? Or is one more liver hazardous than the other? I read here and there how Drol makes cheese of your liver,and such scary stuff,and that dbol is lighter. I can't see why this would be true-they're both c17 alkylated,this is the reason for their toxicity,so they should be equally toxic,like 50 mg dbol would the same as 50 mg drol.
I figured I'd run this question by the experts. I also want to decide on a kicker for my test cycle. I always fancied drol. I prefer adrol over dbol personally as a kicker, but I cannot tell you with any basis in fact which is more toxic.
I've never seen a study or anything remotely science based indicating which is worse for you, so I'll just leave it at my opinion on which I prefer. Toxicity of Caa steroids is considerably over-exaggerated. The difference between Dianabol and Anadrol is negligible. Both are considerably more toxic than Winstrol. So just because they're Caa's does not determine an even level of toxicity across the board. If it's really worrying you, go with Anavar.
Not recommending that, just showing you the power of NAC. Do however, expect a considerable level of side effects from Anadrol. This is from another web site, I'd post the link but it's from a source. Anadrol is the most harmful oral steroid and its intake can cause many considerable side effects. Most users can expect certain pathological changes in their liver values after approximately one week. Those who discontinue the use of oxymetholone will usually show normal values within two months.
Originally Posted by Rumpy. Sounds like bunk gear. Originally Posted by Austinite. Last edited by DreDay; at Austinite and robbiek like this. Yes the anadrol vs dbol debate Never actually gotten bloods while ON dbol, but i have with anadrol a few times. I've never ran more than mg ed of drol and 75mg ed of dbol not at the same time and I feel like mg of drol was definitely the LIMIT, sides weren't that unbearable actually but i was literally force feeding myself every meal On 75mg of Dbol though I felt good, literally zero sides and I felt like i could have taken more.
I would say the biggest difference between dbol and drol is you will KNOW when you find your limit with drol. Like Austinit said previously, the toxicity concerns of oral AAS are often severely over-exagerated. Eve Anadrol, which has at times been made out as the "liver killer" is a relatively safe drug for the liver. If oral AAS were so dangerous, they would have never made as presription drugs for long-term use.
Anadrol was prescribed for decades in the treatment of anemia It was prescribe to men, women, and children for this purpose. One one 12 week study subjects were given mg of Anadrol per day for 12 weeks and at the end of this study, which involved dozens of people, none of them showed any signs of serious liver damage.
In the final analysis, Anadrol was deemed safe and well tolerated and was subsequently produced as a prescription drug. Dianabol, per effective dose, is less toxic than Anadrol, but is likely more toxic per mg. However, only a small percentage of people will ever use mg of Diaabol daily, as 50 mg is more than adequate for basically everyone. I have seen people use mg per day for about a year straight and at the end of the time period, liver enzymes were not pretty, but the they were not in any imminent danger of liver death.
I know one lb world champion powerflifter who has used 10 mg per day for many years straight and his liver readings are near perfect. In my estimation, it is extremely likely a BB'rc could administer 20 mg of d-bol per day 'permanently' and not ever experience any serious liver issues.
The point of all this talk is to demonstrate the ridiculousness of the claims that are repeatedly uttered around BB'ing forums today. These days, we see tons of guys advising people not to run Anadrol or Dianabol for longer than "4 weeks" without a break, or as they claim the individual will place himself in harms way due to excessive liver strain. Many of these guys have no idea what they are talking about.
For decades BB'rs would use orals like Dianabol for weeks or longer and this was considered "normal". After the release of our first OTC designers, which recommended 4 week cycles ultra-conservative recommendations , it seems as if all the "newbs" and less knwoledgable guys started thinking that this recommendation applied to all oral steroids.
Before you know it, we started seeing guys saying that steroids like Dianabol, Anadrol, etc. The following guidelines are "WELL" within reasonable limits I'm making good gains on 20mgs of dbol, can't imagine doing mgs of dbol or mgs of drol Do agree that they are relatively safe. Originally Posted by 5x Originally Posted by Mike Arnold. While some say that their toxicity is overstated, as a general rule they still shouldn't be run for longer than 6 weeks per cycle.
In addition, other liver metabolized substances should be avoided while using a ca such as alcohol, acetaminophen, etc, etc.
Originally Posted by 3ct. That statement isn't necessarily true there's lot of medication with severe long term side effects it doesn't stop them from selling it. Big pharm is all about the money. Just look at Tylenol acetaminophen its very bad for the liver in the long run and its not even a prescription.
I see commercials during the day all the time by lawyers that are asking people if they had such and such side effects by certain medications to call them for a law suit. Toxic medication is always coupled with supporting drugs. Oxymetholone was administered on patients at 50 to mg daily for 12 months with no ill effects, thanks to secondary supporting drugs. Originally Posted by killler. Originally Posted by Docd Another way of putting it in real world examples would be 50mg Anavar var is not as toxic as 50mg of dbol just bc you need a higher dose of one doesn't mean it will be more toxic or have more negative consequences.
I would think a degree in chemistry or medicine would help with finding answers to this unless your comparison is for the same compound at Anavar var ying dosages. Robbie, I'm not saying Drol is better than dbol bc you need more or less of each, but have you ever ran liver enzyme tests to Se the effects of both?
Originally Posted by robbiek I ran drol at mgs and dbol for 50mgs and the liver readings were close to even. I may have worded it wrong. I am saying that I always try to put the least amount of a product into my body to yield results. I know drol gives more strength or so it seems that way to me and many other user but I had some nasty side effects with it and I havent ran it since.
As far as putting on size goes I think they are fairly even in this department. Mg for Mg I would say that DBol is probably more hepatoxic than drol but my main point was using less of any compound to achieve the results.
Since I like size I have no need to use mgs of drol when I can get close to the same if not identical size gains from Dbol at 50mgs. I think the more we achieve with less compounds the better. Sorry if that was worded incorrectly, I hope you understand what I am saying now. Originally Posted by Nosy Parker. Do you have a link maybe to material regarding that prolonged Anadrol use in clinical setting?
I couln't really find anything. I'm only directing this to the bolded part as you probably have far more experience than me when it comes to running cycles, but that bolded part is not a valid argument. If it was we wouldn't have class action lawsuits against any sort of medication or drug that's ever been prescribed. Trevdog and webmacho like this. However, you may want to look on Pub-med. Most of the research done on Anadrol was conducted 50 years ago, when it was first released.
At that time, extensive research was done to determine its safety. Users Browsing this Thread. Is ATD liver toxic? Featuring anabolic steroid information, anabolic steroid drug profiles, anabolic steroid articles, live discussion forums and much more. All times are GMT The time now is Register Help Remember Me? Forum for members to discuss the use of anabolic steroids Page 1 of 2 1 2 Last Jump to page: Join Date Oct Posts 13, Rep Power 0 I prefer adrol over dbol personally as a kicker, but I cannot tell you with any basis in fact which is more toxic.
While this is very true it is worth mentioning the mg for mg argument between the two compounds.